Editorial policy

Prime Public Review aims to make public affairs easier to understand without overstating what a page can establish. We value careful wording, clear sourcing and a visible distinction between editorial work and paid material.

Accuracy and context

We check factual statements against appropriate, identifiable sources and seek enough context to avoid presenting a partial account as the whole story. Explanations distinguish established information from interpretation, and we revise wording when it could mislead.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for their relevance and explanatory value. Partners do not choose our conclusions or control editorial coverage, and any material relationship relevant to a piece is disclosed with it.

Corrections

Readers can use the Contact page to point out a possible error, giving the article and the detail in question. We review specific concerns and correct material when warranted; meaningful changes are identified clearly.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid or partner material is labelled so readers can distinguish it from editorial work. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; where relevant, that fact is stated with the image or its caption.